Diana Speaks

Contrary to what Emily says, I would argue that the site includes quite a lot of information not generally known about Diana, but has Emily really listened to over 20 hours of podcast interviews with the entity claiming to be Diana and communicating via Andrew Russell-Davis? Initially skeptical, I became convinced after listening to the interviews and speaking with the Diana entity several times on the phone. Not once has she been caught out with a glaring mistake, and she has indeed given information not readily available. For instance, that she and her son William had a heated conversation on the phone when she was in Paris just before her assassination, for that's clearly what it was, in which he said her behavior on the yacht off Sardinia with Dodi had upset him. Some conspiracy theorists, including Mohammed al-Fayed, say one of the motives for Diana's assassination was that she was pregnant with Dodi's baby. The Diana entity speaking thru Andrew Russell-Davis, while maintaining she was indeed murdered as part of a conspiracy, insists she was NOT pregnant with Dodi's or anyone else's baby. Listening to hours of interviews, the Diana entity also gives loads of little anecdotes about her life with Charles, etc. which are not readily known. As to why the website has not been closed down, well surely that in itself indicates that those who were closest to Diana in life and knew her personally recognize it is Diana? If someone were impersonating your mother, sister or close friend on the Net would you not try to get the site closed and get the person responsible prosecuted? In fact it appears many close to Diana in life know it is her, listen to her words and take heed of them. One friend of Diana's urged Andrew to publish her post-humous book channeled thru him on the site, as he was keen not to make any money out of this project, and indeed hasn't. All the interviews, written messages, the channeled book, etc. are for all to read free of charge. William has been contacted by Andrew with regard to this channeling and a warm reply was sent thanking him. That too is indicative that those closest to Diana in life know it is really her communicating thru Andrew Russell-Davis. However, in view of what happened to Diana in Paris and the subsequent cover-up, it is dangerous for prominent people to openly say that it really is Diana communicating. Still as critical of the Establishment as she was in life, the Diana entity is outspoken and not afraid to say that the Paris crash was no accident, point out the reasons why this is the case, and also to cast doubt on the very future of the Monarchy and comment on the restrictive lifestyle it would mean for William were he to one day become King. The site is there and people who knew Diana in life listen to and read the channeled messages. The powers-that-be leave the site there hoping it will be ignored/ridiculed. To close it down would draw attention to it, as the channeled messages/interviews, etc. are safely stored and can easily be reposted to a new site, and people en masse may then start paying attention. This is why there has been no attempt to close down the present site, although the first Diana Speaks site was badly corrupted (we still don't know why) and eventually had to be replaced by the current one. My advice is don't voice an opinion on this site till you've listened to over 40 podcast interviews in their entirety, and then you are qualified to make a judgment.

What a load of rubbish, and offensive to all those who knew Diana especially her family. The fella on this site, seems obsessive, and has read and analized Diana's voice, tone and dialect, there are big flaws on the site, as there is nothing new and not known about the Princess. I'm surprised it hasn't been closed down. I think there are more professional, and better ways to demonstrate our love and compassion for the late Princess, by visiting her official charity sites. This is deeply upsetting for her family.

We have found that this business does not have SSL (secure sockets layer), which means that you should think twice before trusting this business with your data, such as personal information or credit card details, because your information will not be digitally connected to a cryptographic key and secure connection cannot be established. We found that the domain for this business is older than two years which could be an indication that this is a trustworthy business with an established customer base and experience in their field.