4 / 5
Trust Score
3.8
Reviews
3
Social
5
Featured
4.5
Technical
Is transparentfxtrading.com legit?
- Many trusted websites are linking to this site
- The site has mostly good reviews
- The SSL certificate is valid
- This website has existed for more than 3 years
- Facebook account found with large audience
- Instagram account found but audience is small
- Business not mentioned on Wikipedia
- Pinterest account not found
- Linkedin account not found
- Twitter account not found
- Youtube account not found
Reviews Analysis
12
reviews
vs
0
AI declined reviews
0%
NON VALIDATED REVIEWS
Usually stable businesses have more than 5 authority websites mentions, this one has 15 authority websites mentions and 2 mentions in other websites
Based on 581 reviews
Smart.Reviews
4
12 reviews
Trustpilot
4.7
569 reviews
Transparentfxtrading.com Review
No description for this company.
Transparentfxtrading.com Customer Service Contacts
No contact details for this company.
Share the company's rating
Share Preview
Is this your company?
Access SmartReviews free tools for businesses and start getting closer to your customers today!
Last update: Wed, Mar 9, 2022 12:08 AM
And this is sickening because Nik is literally the BEST and puts so much passion in everything he does, and it's not the first program I join, so I know how to distinguish the Best from the rest
But his strategies, expecially the new one, don't reach the exceptional results he says.
It is simply to backtest past data and to show how great results you can obtain, but if you do many and serious backtests you realize that you have wasted a lot of time.
The new strategy costs about 600 euro:
600 x 1000 students = 600.000 euro..much better to sell than to trade
You are the best Nik keep doing what you do
The only reason for which I can possibly think that a person might give a bad review to his program is either because they are a competitor, or because they fell for the fake website scam that was created using the transparent FX logo. Keep doing what you do Nik
This explains why he has to sell these courses for such a high price - he cannot make money from trading himself. And myfxbook results can so easily be faked nowadays. If you want to believe that he is profitable, don't be satisfied with myfxbook, ask for a signed brokerage statement regarding all of his accounts he has had since selling the course. And make sure that the statement confirms that its all of them, otherwise he can just show one account that is profitable.
The problem is that many people believe the strategy because Nik either asks them to write a good review, or the people giving good feedback only did the strategy for like one week and not over an entire year like I did. And not only that: don't believe ANY good reviews, because apparently he fakes them even here on trustpilot. If you need proof of that just go on https://imgur. com/a/2JPx1w8? and you'll see and example review that is clearly faked by himself. Therefore if I were you, I would not trust any future or past review that is overly positive - the people either don't have tested the strategy for an entire year or its a fake review from Nik himself.
I still think this was a good lesson for me - because I learned a lot of things which I should not do when entering into forex, such as buying extremely overpriced courses and believing that good forex traders actually need to sell them. Because there is better information available on the internet, which can help you build your own strategy. But of course, if you want to make a lot of money in a short time, don't develop a strategy. Just sell a forex course and get in as many people as possible.
Speaking about Nik as he is one of the other marketers out there makes no sense, not only he answers every single question we have every single day, but he also provided with the area 51 probably the best strategy out there, and I HAVE ACTUALLY JOINED. Next time guys, before giving a review, at least first join the course Hahaha, it doesn't make much sense otherwise.
And the swing trading strategies are VERY good as well, I have been consistent with them after learning them for 6 months already, and yes I do have a myfxbook to prove it.
Bottom line: initially he tried to be the „good guy“, now he‘s just like every other forex guru out there, trying to get into your pocket and take your money, because he can‘t make money from actual trading himself.
And regarding the all screenshots of answers from "successful" students; do you realise that literally EVERY forex "educator" posts tons of those daily? Even if they are real (and most of them aren't), its a classical case of a mixture of Denial and Stockholm Syndrome. If you spend a lot of money on a course and realise that what you got in return is utter nonsense, you psychologically try to deny the mistake that you have done; while claiming that you made "profits" towards your "mentor" for approval.
The funny thing is that people are stupid enough to believe that the trading methods he uses actually work. These methods are totally prosaic, and won't even work slightly in a world where 95% of forex trading is done by algorithms that were developed over years by incredibly smart people. You cannot outsmart such an algorithm with some fibonacci, trendlines, S&R and certain numbers in the market. These methods were based on human psychology, which might have worked 20 years ago - but not in the year 2020. And when a trader realises his strategy does not work, what does he do? He makes a course, selling the dreams of becoming a forex trader. A brilliant analogy is the gold rush from 1948-1955. The people who got rich were not the ones digging for gold - but the ones selling the shovels. Further, all these trading methods used in the strategy are actually proven wrong through statistical analyses by wall street analysts. A very interesting read is for example "Trendlines Are Mathematically Absurd" by senior strategist Kevin Brent Cook. Even more importantly, the fibonacci levels were proven by data to not hold. The problem is, that in HINDSIGHT, one can always "filter out" points where the price bounced off some fibonacci levels. For more information why fibonacci is complete nonsense in TODAY'S world of trading, read Arthur Merill's Book "Filtered Waves", where he statistically proves that there is no reliable way that the 50%, 23.6%, 38.2% or 61.8% levels have any significance with regard to price behaviour.
I actually tracked the results of his "signals" he provides in the group. The overall gain is -0.25%, which he hides by only taking the winning trades into is evaluation. To further show how greedy this "educator" is consider that he recently published a "secret" program for students only, where he claims to have made a 670% gain in one and a half months. If that doesn't ring all your alarm bells, you're a lost case. Even more ironically he once said he lives by the principle, "I don't upsell to my students", just to gain trust. A principle that he apparently now discarded due to his greed, further proving the point that he makes his income from the course and not the actual trading.
Please don't fall for this like I did.
E. R.
Usually stable businesses have more than 5 authority websites mentions, this one has 15 authority websites mentions and 2 mentions in other websites
Transparentfxtrading.com Review
No description for this company.
Transparentfxtrading.com Customer Service Contacts
No contact details for this company.
Share the company's rating
Share Preview
Is this your company?
Access SmartReviews free tools for businesses and start getting closer to your customers today!
I have been in other programs Like Astro and falcon, and all I can say is that Nik is just the next level, he answers all questions every day and what surprised me is that he answers questions also Saturday and Sunday!!!
The strategies are great and the market breakdowns help you catch the exact same trades that he places. We are currently in 10R profit for the month.
The negative reviews on this page I can't understand how they could possibly be here, my only reasoning is that they might come from competitors or someone that fell for the fake website that was created using Niks logo from a competitor selling a fake program.
4 years ago
review by Mateo Sanders